<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call for&#160;Formaholics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wufoo.com/2007/05/10/call-for-formaholics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wufoo.com/2007/05/10/call-for-formaholics/</link>
	<description>Making forms easy + fast + fun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:18:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Campbell</title>
		<link>http://wufoo.com/2007/05/10/call-for-formaholics/comment-page-1/#comment-4494</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wufoo.com/blog/2007/05/10/call-for-formaholics/#comment-4494</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We have no immediate plans to do so. HTML is such a well supported standard that it makes sense for public facing forms to be there. They are most likely to work on screen readers and mobile devices, and they can be easily customized with CSS. Plus, no plugin is required. We always keep an eye on emerging technologies, but do not feel it is time to dive into these two just yet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have no immediate plans to do so. HTML is such a well supported standard that it makes sense for public facing forms to be there. They are most likely to work on screen readers and mobile devices, and they can be easily customized with CSS. Plus, no plugin is required. We always keep an eye on emerging technologies, but do not feel it is time to dive into these two just yet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: levon</title>
		<link>http://wufoo.com/2007/05/10/call-for-formaholics/comment-page-1/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>levon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wufoo.com/blog/2007/05/10/call-for-formaholics/#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Didn&#039;t know where else to post this question, but I wanted to ask you guys:
What is your opinion on technologies such as Microsoft&#039;s Sliverlight and Adobe&#039;s Flex MX? 
It looks to be a  better way to build rich user friendly forms. 
Are you guys going to move in that direction? 
If not, why?
Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t know where else to post this question, but I wanted to ask you guys:
What is your opinion on technologies such as Microsoft&#8217;s Sliverlight and Adobe&#8217;s Flex MX? 
It looks to be a  better way to build rich user friendly forms. 
Are you guys going to move in that direction? 
If not, why?
Thanks.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://wufoo.com/2007/05/10/call-for-formaholics/comment-page-1/#comment-4491</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wufoo.com/blog/2007/05/10/call-for-formaholics/#comment-4491</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Paging&quot;... that&#039;s what I like to hear!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Paging&#8221;&#8230; that&#8217;s what I like to hear!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
